Now, when Guru Nanak disappeared into the river for three days, two accounts were made about this event. One states that as he went under the water and came out, He heard God’s calling to dedicate himself completely to the service of God and tohumanity. This is similar to the holy spirit coming down to Jesus and being called "preach the two greatest commandments", which is to “Love the true Creator with all thy heart, soul and mind and to love thy neighbor as you love yourself.”
Then the second version states that when he went into the river, he disappeared for three days until he came back and said “I had went to God’s court” and there is “no Hindu and no Muslim”. Now when he said “I went to God’s court”, this can connect to the same “ascension" to heaven that the Prophet Muhammed had went to, as He rode upon a creature called the Baraq to God’s court. So, as the Prophet Muhammed went to heaven and came back to earth, the same "coincidently" happens the same way to Guru Nanak as well.
Then in Guru Nanak’s life as a child, it states that he would astound the teachers and doctors with his intellect. This can surely connect to Jesus' life in Luke 2:46,47: “And it came to pass, that after three days found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers”. The Prophet Muhammed would speak about the end of days and how these signs would come as well as the resurrection. Even Jesus speaks of “rumors of wars in the end of days” and how the “sun would be darkened, the moon not giving her light and the stars falling” in Mark 13. These are the similar signs as stated in throughout the Quran. (as the Quran is the book of warnings of the last days, despite the tampering of course)
Then in the movie “The Message” (1977 version), details how the Prophet's Sahabas (disciples) will be hated by the people because of him and his teachings. This would also mirror to what Jesus had said in Mark 13:9 “But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the Synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them.”Jesus, Guru Nanak and Muhammad were Prophets with similar lives, persecutions, teachings, and who tried to get the people back to the worship of the One true God.
Now is this all a coincidence? Could the "victors of history" tear the life of the Prophet's life into three (or many) to fool the masses to thinking that they are different people with different timelines? In history, they want people to focus on the timelines that is in and beyond 1000 years and yet, the formation of the "Gregorian calendar" came into the 1500s? So, how can this be if we are told it's true based on what they state? You have to question everything.
Now, if this is true about the Prophet, then the real man they called the Prophet Muhammed wouldn't have created this version of Islam, because it appeals to the black goddess worship, as Acts 19:35 states and the "image" that fell down from heaven (The black stone). And he wouldn't be advocating for the cross worship either, as it still goes back to the worship of the black gods. So, then comes to the conclusion of the "Council of Nicea", (Baal's Priest) changing the life of the real Jesus to the black Jesus, by almagamating them together and as well, seperating them into other Prophets.
(Now, I didn't mention the Prophet and founder of the Zoroastrian religion name Zoroaster or Zarathrustra. It seems as though he himself would have "Red hair" and would be the one to lead the people back to the one true God. However, this practice of keeping the fire was taught by the God of fire Himself in the Bible, and as well to keeping the fire from going out. So, I find that history isn't being portrayed correctly as to who the True God is, and who the real Isrealites are and how they are the Aryans. The world definitely wants to keep the people from knowing who they are, and where their other brethrens are just like the Bible states....)
VOLUME II - BOOK III - CHAPTER II Page 219 "Jesus and Mohamed were philosophers, preachers of wisdom and morality to their countrymen, and, like Socrates and Pythagoras, neither of them left a single word of writing behind him. Some persons believe Jesus to have been murdered by the priests, others state that he escaped them; but at all events, he seems to have offered no active opposition. Mohamed, on the contrary, when struck, returned the blow and beat his enemies. But in each case the moment the preacher was gone, books enow were manufactured by those whose interest it was to establish a dominion over their fellow-creatures. In each case, I have no doubt, the early actors in the drama were well-meaning fanatical devotees. I doubt not that in India and in Europe millions went over from the religions of the two Cristnas (the God of India and the God of Rome), to that of the new Avatar, who, in the West, protected them by his arms against the sectaries of the old Avatar. For though the followers of the new Avatar never persecuted, the followers of the old one always did. It is not surprising under these circumstances, that the new Avatar should have protected his followers by his arms. This would excuse, if it did not justify, the wars of Mohamed, and also account for his success."
CONCLUSION of the "The Anacalypsis" Page 449 "I now conclude with a simple statement of what, (as it appears to me,) an unprejudiced and dispassionate inquirer after truth may reasonably believe respecting Jesus and his doctrines. If any learned and liberalminded priest shall think that I have mistaken any fact, or erred in the conduct of any argument, or in any conclusion which I may have drawn, I shall be extremely happy to receive this correction. I shall notice it, with the respect it deserves, in an appendix, which I shall publish for this and other purposes.* In the time of Tiberius appeared a man of the name of John. He was a Nazarite, of the monastic order of the Pythagorean Essenes, and lived the life of a hermit. He was put to death by Herod, for rebuking him for his vices. About the same time lived a person, who was his cousin, whose original name has probably been changed, like that of Abraham, Jacob, Joshua, Pythagoras, &c., but who has since been known by the name of JESUS CHRIST. This person was also a Nazarite, of the same sect or monastic order—the Pythagorean Essenes. He, like his cousin John, was a philosopher, a teacher of morality and of reformation of manners to his Jewish countrymen. He was put to death** by the priests of the Pharisees, the prevailing or orthodox sect, at that time, in Judea, against whose vices he loudly declaimed, and whose hypocrisy he exposed. He was a person of a most virtuous life and amiable manners—the Socrates or Pythagoras of his day. We know that he taught a very strict and pure morality, the unity of God, the immortality of the soul, and that this life is only a state of probation for a state of future existence, in which every person will be rewarded or punished according to his merits or demerits. These are the facts which we know respecting Jesus and his doctrines,— and as I believe that the facts are real, and that the doctrines are true, I consider that I am his follower, his disciple, and a Christian. * “In the midst of life we are in death.” Two years and a half before this sentence was printed, the Author was numbered with the dead ! Editor." **
"As this part of the Author’s MS. was transmitted, by his direction, to the printer, unaltered, it may admit of doubt whether he was fully satisfied with the evidence adduced from Irenæus in proof that Jesus Christ was not crucified, but attained the age of fifty. See supra, pp. 120-123, 142, 228. Editor."
(It's very close to the age of the Prophet Muhammed's death at age 61 or 62, who again would have children....)
Jesus was said to have brothers and sister (or considered "half") that were looking for him along with his mother. Matthew Chapter 12:46 "While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."
Matthew 13 "54And when he was come into his own country, he taught them in their synagogue, insomuch that they were astonished, and said, Whence hath this man this wisdom, and these mighty works? 55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? 56And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things? 57And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house."
Luke Chapter 8 "19Then came to him his mother and his brethren, and could not come at him for the press. 20And it was told him by certain which said, Thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to see thee. 21And he answered and said unto them, My mother and my brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it."